Chapter 3: Terms Implied at Common Law I: General Principles
INTRODUCTION 3.01 This chapter concerns terms which are implied into all contracts of a particular type (unless the express words of the contract contradict the proposed implied term), where the implication is made by the courts as a necessary incident of the type of contract concerned, rather than being implied either by statute or else from custom or usage of the trade. As Lord Cross of Chelsea put it in Liverpool City Council v. Irwin: When it implies a term in a contract the court is sometimes laying down a general rule that in all contracts of a certain type – sale of goods, master and servant, landlord and tenant and so on – some provision is to be implied unless the parties have expressly excluded it.1 3.02 Probably the leading cases on this are now the House of Lords decisions in Lister v. Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co. Ltd,2 and Liverpool City Council v. Irwin.3 However, it would be useful to consider the  A.C. 239 at 257.  A.C. 555;  2 W.L.R. 158. 3  A.C. 239;  2 All E.R. 39;  2 W.L.R. 562. Applied in Ferguson v. John Dawson & Partners (Contractors) Ltd  3 All E.R. 817;  1 W.L.R. 1213;  2 Lloyd’s Rep. 669 (C.A.), Wettern Electric Ltd v. Welsh Development Agency  Q.B. 796;  2 All E.R. 629;  2 W.L.R. 897 (Q.B.D.), Southern Water Authority v. Carey  2 All E.R. 1077 (Q.B.D.), Tadd v. Eastwood  I.C.R. 132;...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.