Educating Economists
Show Less

Educating Economists

The Teagle Discussion on Re-evaluating the Undergraduate Economics Major

Edited by David Colander and KimMarie McGoldrick

The economics major is a central part of a college education. But is that economics major doing what it is meant to do? And if not, how should it be changed? This book raises a set of provocative questions that encourage readers to look at the economics major in a different light than it is typically considered and provides a series of recommendations for change.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Reflections on Introductory Course Structures

Paul W. Grimes


Paul W. Grimes One of the underlying themes of the Teagle Report is the recognition that institutional forces within academe have narrowed and vocationalized the traditional college major. The authors rightfully argue that the vocation in question is that of an academic researcher or specialist within the students’ discipline. As a result, students are deprived of a broader understanding of the social context and relevance of their chosen field. Nowhere is this more true than in economics; and it generally begins with students’ first exposure to the discipline. Across the country more than 1 million college students enroll in principles of economics courses each academic year, and their classroom experiences are virtually the same. Whether the course is taken at an elite private college or at a large state-supported research university, students study remarkably similar material from remarkably similar textbooks. Not only are today’s introductory textbooks “structured after the Samuelsonian texts of the 1950s,” (see pp. 31–2 of the report, Chapter 1, this volume) they are often regarded as commodities by the faculty that teach from them. Pick up any “principles book” and you can be assured that it includes the basic canon of material that makes up 90 percent of the typical “principles course” at a vast majority of US colleges and universities. As a result, textbook adoptions are often not preceded by careful study and consideration by a department’s faculty. Today, textbook decisions tend to hinge on matters of convenience (“What did we use last year?”) or...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.