Globalization and Precarious Forms of Production and Employment
Show Less

Globalization and Precarious Forms of Production and Employment

Challenges for Workers and Unions

Edited by Carole Thornley, Steve Jefferys and Beatrice Appay

This important and cross-disciplinary book explores globalization alongside precarious forms of production and employment, and how these factors have impacted on workers and trade unions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The Rise in Precarious Employment and Union Responses in Australia

Iain Campbell


Iain Campbell INTRODUCTION Precariousness is a contested concept (Barbier, 2005). In this chapter precarious employment is understood as employment that is deficient in one or more aspects of labour security when compared with the societal standard for a decent job (Vosko et al., 2009). The rise in precarious employment in Australia refers to two distinct but overlapping processes. First, it refers to the resurgence of certain forms of non-standard employment that are characterized by substandard rights and benefits. Second, it refers to the spread of precariousness within sections of what has usually been regarded as the core workforce, supposedly protected by a full-time ‘permanent’ employment contract. Not all non-standard forms of employment are precarious. The three forms that attract concern in Australia are: marginal self-employment, fixed-term waged work and casual waged work. Concerns with selfemployment are focused on a group of independent contractors who are more properly regarded as ‘dependent’, that is, subordinate in practice to just one employer. They are often indistinguishable from employees in the way they work within the workplace, though they lack the standard rights and benefits of employees. The current size of this group is small – an estimated 2.6 per cent of the workforce (Table 8.1) – but dependent contracting is common in blue-collar industries such as transport and construction, where it is used by employers to avoid the costs associated with standard employment and union organization (Productivity Commission 2006, pp. 132–8). Apart from small categories such as apprentices and trainees, the two main types...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.