Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Explaining Administrative Law: Reflections on Federal Administrative Law in Nineteenth Century America

Jerry L. Mashaw


Jerry L. Mashaw Historians of administrative law, including several contributors to this volume, address the same general question: What explains the emergence of a ‘law of administration’ in its various forms across different nation states? While hardly objecting to alternative accounts, scholars emphasize a number of different factors. Bernardo Sordi’s chapter stresses particular constitutional and ideological consequences in the historical development of certain leading nations (notably, France, Germany, and Britain). In Sordi’s presentation, these developments do much to explain the emergence of a specifically public law governing ‘administrative acts’ of the state, distinguished from the evolving realm of private law, both ancient and modern. John Ohnesorge, while certainly acknowledging the significance of these national contributions (notably that of Germany, along with that of the United States), also suggests the importance of timing or staging of developments in particular economies and in a nation’s political organization and political ideology. Nicholas Parrillo pays particular attention to pragmatic adjustments in administrative forms that ultimately coalesce – or fail to coalesce – into a new paradigm of governance that becomes distinctive to a nation’s administrative arrangements. And moving beyond historical perspectives strictly speaking, Elizabeth McGill and Daniel Ortiz focus on constitutional structure and critique positive political theory by showing that it cannot explain the prevalence of active judicial review in Europe’s parliamentary systems. These chapters, plus the discussions at the conference of which they were a part, considered the steady growth of state activity and its proliferation into new domains. As the state grows, administrative law...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.