Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Administrative State Socialism and its Constitutional Aftermath

Kim Lane Scheppele


Kim Lane Scheppele The temple of bourgeois authority is legislation and its fetish is the law; the temple of the socialist world system is administration and its divine service is work. It is by no accident that the political ideals of the bourgeoisie are embodied in parliamentarism and the Rechtsstaat, whereas, the socialist community is, in its very nature, primarily a community of administration. (A.G. Goikhbarg, quoted in Quigley 2007: 55)1 The usual narrative about the rise of the administrative state seems universal – and runs as follows. Modern states do a great deal more than did pre-modern states. A great many of these new functions are highly technical in nature. They are so technical, in fact, that generalist parliaments cannot possibly write statutes detailed enough to provide precise and responsive guidance in all of the areas where states now act. To do all of the things that modern states do, therefore, there must be a division of labor among constitutional norms of the most general sort that provide the horizons of principle and procedure, legislative norms of intermediate generality that set general policy in specific fields and regulatory norms that provide the detail necessary for actual day-to-day governance. The administrative state is the result of the growth of norms in this last category. Over time, regulation has increased in scope and complexity, so that the historical sweep of administrative change always moves toward an ever-increasing density of administrative regulation and administrative governance. The challenge for modern administrative law is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.