Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: ‘Creatures of the State’: Regulatory Federalism, Local Immunities, and EU Waste Regulation in Comparative Perspective

Fernanda G. Nicola


Fernanda G. Nicola The European Union (EU) has committed itself to strengthening local power in a variety of ways. Since the 1980s, Brussels has aimed to increase the legitimacy of EU law and policy by enhancing the number of subnational actors and participants in its decisionmaking processes. In reaching out to individuals, associations and especially to local actors, the EU could potentially undermine the power of its Member States. However, EU law continues to privilege the relation between Brussels and its Member States rather than its developing relationship with subnational actors. Thus, when aiming to increase the power of local governments, EU law often encounters a problem: such empowerment either does not take place, or it backfires in ways often disruptive of the EU’s supranational aims. This situation resonates with what US local government law scholars have called the ‘creature of the state’ problem. In the name of decentralization, federal courts allow states to structure local power in any way they see fit; the federal courts cannot mandate particular local power structures in furtherance of federal goals without violating the constitutional commitment to federalism. Likewise, when EU law regulates local matters such as waste management, it cannot create new legal powers for subnational actors. Rather, decentralization through EU law relies on the existing national-local structure, which differs in each Member State and creates two different types of problems. A first problem is present in both the EU and the US and concerns the challenge of regulatory federalism, that is, the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.