Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Presidential Dominance from a Comparative Perspective: The Relationship between the Executive Branch and Regulatory Agencies in Brazil

Mariana Mota Prado


Mariana Mota Prado* National legal systems appear increasingly similar, largely due to the wholesale transplantation of legal principles and institutional arrangements across national borders. However, although these transplanted institutions might initially look similar, considerable differences emerge as they operate in practice. By definition, transplanted institutions function within a different political system. Immersed in a new political environment, these institutions will not always mimic their counterparts in the country of origin. The effectiveness of transplanted laws, and, therefore, the institutions created by them, depends on their consistency with or their adaptation to the preexisting legal order in the receiving country (Berkowitz et al. 2003). For comparative law scholars, the different operation of original and transplanted institutions suggests that transplanted academic theories, based on the country of origin, cannot be uncritically applied to analyze these new institutions. To illustrate this, I shall discuss the case of regulatory agencies. In the last two decades, independent agencies have become the primary means of regulating infrastructure industries worldwide (Gilardi 2008). This is especially true in Latin America (Jordana and Levi Faur 2005). The United States independent agency model served as a blueprint in most cases. Despite these institutional similarities, there is one important difference: Latin American agencies operate within presidential systems that differ significantly from the US system. For example, the Brazilian President is substantially more powerful vis-à-vis the Brazilian Congress than is the White House vis-à-vis the American Congress. US literature uses the principal-agent framework to analyze regulatory agencies, showing that Congress...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.