Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

  • Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 34: A Restatement of European Administrative Law: Problems and Prospects

George A. Bermann

Extract

34 A restatement of European administrative law: problems and prospects George A. Bermann The European Union is a vast regulatory enterprise (Lindseth 2006). Thanks to a mass of both primary legislation (predicated directly on the Treaty Establishing the European Community1 and the Treaty on European Union2) and secondary legislation (adopted by one or more of the EU institutions via delegation through pieces of primary legislation), the EU institutions exercise an abundance of rulemaking authority. They also enjoy, on the basis of these same normative instruments, the authority to render large numbers of individualized decisions. This combination of rulemaking and adjudicatory power has enabled the European Union to become an arena of administrative law activity as intensive as any to be found on the globe (Bermann et al. 2008a). One of the virtues of the European Union, particularly in evidence in recent years, has been its taste for procedural innovation and experimentation (de Búrca and Scott 2007, de Búrca and Walker 2007). However, these have come at a price. A disconnect exists between the proliferation of procedural regimes, on the one hand, and the relative absence of general standards of administrative procedure and its review, on the other. As the EU law literature never fails to emphasize, at stake are the transparency and legitimacy of EU law and the European Union itself (Joerges et al. 2004, Larsson and Schaefer 2006: 541). These reflections have generated a strong impulse to make sense of the administrative procedure of the European Union....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.