Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

  • Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 35: Adversarial Legalism and Administrative Law in the European Union

R. Daniel Kelemen

Extract

35 Adversarial legalism and administrative law in the European Union R. Daniel Kelemen European Union (EU) administrative law has tended to promote a juridification of administrative procedures across the Union. This tendency seems puzzling because for more than thirty years, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has emphasized that member state legal systems enjoy ‘procedural autonomy’ when implementing acts of Community law, with regard to both the procedures involved and the remedies available to citizens.1 And yet, despite this supposed procedural autonomy, the EU has developed an extensive body of law guaranteeing European citizens a host of procedural rights and increasingly forcing national authorities to respect common rules of administrative procedure. This ‘Europeanization’ of administrative law has pressed member states to ensure greater transparency, accountability and access to justice in their administrative processes and has encouraged more searching judicial review of administrative action. The EU has developed an administrative law that applies both to itself when it directly implements Community law and to national administrations when – as is more common – they implement Community law on behalf of the EU. And ultimately, the impact of European administrative law at the national level extends beyond instances in which national authorities are implementing EU law. For once a procedural right or remedy is granted in EU-related matters, it becomes difficult to withhold that right or remedy in purely national matters. As Carol Harlow has put it, EU administrative law ‘creates pressure for judicial resolution of every problem and denies its rightful place to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.