Comparative Administrative Law
Show Less

Comparative Administrative Law

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 37: Individual Rights and Transnational Networks

Francesca Bignami


Francesca Bignami Today the paradigm of public policymaking is global, not simply national or local. Rules and standards are decided, fiscal and macroeconomic policy is determined, and policy commitments are enforced through regional and global institutions that have simultaneously built upon and transformed their national bureaucratic counterparts. Some of these institutions are traditional international organizations and tribunals, which have proliferated and expanded over recent years. Yet transnational regulatory networks, in which decisionmaking occurs through routine contacts among national civil servants, are quickly becoming the primary institutional vehicle through which cross-national policymaking occurs. Networks marry domestic bureaucratic capacity with transnational policy ambitions and thus fall at the intersection of a number of disciplines: administrative, criminal, and constitutional law, international law, public policy studies and international relations theory. These different research traditions have begun to raise and offer answers to a number of important questions about the nature and promise of regulatory networks: Under what circumstances do states choose to cooperate through networks as opposed to international organizations and more traditional international institutions (Raustiala 2002, Eilstrup-Sangiovanni 2009)? Relatedly, what are the advantages and disadvantages of networks over more traditional forms of international cooperation (Slaughter 2004, Verdier 2009, Zaring 1998)? Under what circumstances can this form of transnational cooperation be expected to generate international convergence or other types of policy outcomes (Singer 2007)? And what types of public law metrics should be used to evaluate regulatory networks and how has the experience so far measured up to the chosen normative metric (Kingsbury et...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.