Cultural Property Law and Restitution
Show Less

Cultural Property Law and Restitution

A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law

Irini A. Stamatoudi

This invaluable book, for the first time, brings together the international and European Union legal framework on cultural property law and the restitution of cultural property. Drawing on the author’s extensive experience of international disputes, it provides a very comprehensive and useful commentary.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Dispute Resolution in Cultural Property Cases

Irini A. Stamatoudi


5.1 JUDICIAL RECOURSE Cultural property claims, especially those involving the return of cultural objects to their countries of origin, are usually international claims. Either they involve more than one state or, even where states are not involved, they are trans-border claims where one party in one state is required to return a cultural object to another party in another state.1 International conventions apply in both inter-state and private disputes, depending on the scope of the convention. Sometimes, the application of the convention to the case will take the form of general principles derived from it. Up to now experience has shown that recourse to the courts usually takes place if a) the claim is crystal clear in terms of its facts (e.g. how the object has been alienated from the claimant, where it is found, who owns or possesses it) and its legal bases (the law applicable in the case at issue clearly provides for its return/restitution, the claim is not statute barred and so on), and b) there are private parties involved where the influence of a state cannot be used for the out-of-court settlement of the case. Litigation is usually expensive and takes time. However, it also gives claimants the opportunity to act swiftly in order not to have their claim statute-barred (the filing of a suit interrupts the running of any time limitations and one can also file for provisional measures/injunction in order to ‘freeze a situation’2 until a final decision is reached). On top of that,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.