Cultural Property Law and Restitution
Show Less

Cultural Property Law and Restitution

A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law

Irini A. Stamatoudi

This invaluable book, for the first time, brings together the international and European Union legal framework on cultural property law and the restitution of cultural property. Drawing on the author’s extensive experience of international disputes, it provides a very comprehensive and useful commentary.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content


Irini A. Stamatoudi


Although the ‘tale’ of cultural property law is very much a ‘Tale of Two Cities’, the nationalist and the cosmopolitan, it is also true that the boundaries between the nationalist and the internationalist approaches have been blurred by more pragmatic views; those dictated by reality, mutual understanding and co-operation. Both sides occasionally use the same arguments to argue different points. ‘Retention’, for example, is used to indicate the ‘retention’ of cultural objects both in collections (by museums and private collectors) and in state territory (by states). ‘Movement of art’ is used by internationalists to argue that any home can be a good home for cultural heritage and by nationalists on the basis of cultural diplomacy and missionary art through loans. The trend, however (reflected in particular in the 1970 UNESCO Convention, the 1995 Unidroit Convention and European Union law and in general in soft law instruments) is that a nation is the most appropriate custodian of its own cultural heritage. That assumption is made on the basis of geography, historical background, cultural identity and context and does not run counter to the preservation of cultural heritage for the sake of humanity. Humanity incorporates diversity and plurality. Preservation of national cultural heritage serves exactly that.1 1 See the Preamble to the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: .  .  . Affirming that cultural diversity is a defining characteristic of humanity, Conscious that cultural diversity forms a common heritage of humanity and should be cherished and preserved...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.