Women, Gender and Rural Development in China
Show Less

Women, Gender and Rural Development in China

Edited by Tamara Jacka and Sally Sargeson

This multidisciplinary book explores gender politics in the discourses and practices of development in rural China. The contributors – scholars in political science, anthropology, gender, development and Chinese studies – examine how differently positioned women are shaping rural development, and how development is affecting women’s capabilities and gender power relations.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Myths and Realities: Gender and Participation in a Donor-aided Project in Northern China

Yang Lichao


Yang Lichao INTRODUCTION Over the last two decades, both ‘gender mainstreaming’ and participatory approaches have shaped the goals and methods adopted in donor-aided development projects in China. This study explores one such project, conducted from 2002 to 2006 in north-western Inner Mongolia. Drawing on my own experience working on the project in the last two years of its implementation, I examine how far and in what ways gender and participation were incorporated into project policies, procedures and activities, and use the project as a case study to explore the political, institutional and cultural constraints affecting the gender outcomes of participatory approaches to development in the Chinese context. The chapter contains five sections: It begins with a general review of the evolution of participatory approaches to gender issues in development, and explains how participation has become a discursive ‘orthodoxy’ in China. The second section outlines the background of the project and the gender aims, policies and implementation procedures set out in project documents. The third provides an ethnographic account of three episodes illustrating the extent to which participatory approaches were applied to achieve the project’s gender equity aims in project interventions. The fourth section analyses the gender outcomes of the project, focusing specifically on why and how participatory project planning and activities were constrained by local political, institutional and cultural processes. The final section draws a brief conclusion. This study does not mean to make an evaluation or a negative judgement on a specific project, nor does it aim to explain...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.