New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe
Show Less

New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe

A Legal, Empirical, and Economic Analysis

Edited by Mark Tuil and Louis Visscher

This unique and timely book analyses the problem of financing civil litigation. The expert contributors discuss the legal possibilities and difficulties associated with several instruments – including cost shifting, fee arrangements, legal expense insurance and group litigation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: No Cure, No Pay and Contingency Fees

Michael Faure, Fokke Fernhout and Niels Philipsen


Michael Faure, Fokke Fernhout and Niels Philipsen 1. INTRODUCTION In many European countries lawyers are prohibited in one way or another from charging fees on the basis of the outcome of the case. Such prohibitions can be found in statutes as well as in codes of conduct of law societies and comparable organizations. These prohibitions are mostly rooted in a firm belief that lawyers – especially lawyers who represent their clients in litigation, like solicitors and barristers – can only maintain their independence and can only serve justice if their private interests are not in any way affected by the outcome of a case (Faure, Fernhout and Philipsen 2009, p. 19). However, recent developments show that conflicting points of view are adopted by those responsible for policy in matters with European implications. On the one hand, the object of attaining free competition and free movement of services is responsible for an impulse towards abolishing all restrictions on lawyers’ fees, as was reflected in 2004 in the Report on Competition in Professional Services issued by the European Commission (COM 2004, 83, 9 February 2004).1 Apparently, according to the European Commission, lawyers’ fees should be liberalized and unimpeded by state and professional regulations. On the other hand, the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Union (CCBE) still requires its member organizations to proscribe the ‘quota pars litis’ agreement and has its doubts about ‘no win no fee’ agreements (for a precise definition of these terms see below). If these...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.