The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology

Edited by John B. Davis and D. Wade Hands

Bringing together a collection of leading contributors to this new methodological thinking, the authors explain how it differs from the past and point towards further concerns and future issues. The recent research programs explored include behavioral and experimental economics, neuroeconomics, new welfare theory, happiness and subjective well-being research, geographical economics, complexity and computational economics, agent-based modeling, evolutionary thinking, macroeconomics and Keynesianism after the crisis, and new thinking about the status of the economics profession and the role of the media in economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Experimental Economics

Ana C. Santos


Ana C. Santos1 3.1 INTRODUCTION Not so long ago economics was considered to be a non-experimental science. This generalized perception has marked the experimental field of economics since its early years. In the 1950s, when experiments started to be carried out in a more systematic way, the profession did not see the purpose and the relevance of laboratory experiments. Given the skepticism towards experimentation, the pioneers concentrated on producing a variety of examples of their work before arguing for the relevance and practical usefulness of economics experiments.2 The strategy paid off. It contributed to the rapid stabilization of the field’s aims, standards, benchmarks and techniques, and as a result, to the fast growth of experimental economics research.3 In the early 1980s experimental economics had already turned into Kuhnian ‘normal’ science in that researchers had a set of established standards for guiding the selection of problem-situations that could be solved with available conceptual and instrumental tools. In 2002 its official recognition arrived with the award of the Nobel memorial prize to Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith for their pioneering experimental work, the former in the study of human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty, and the latter in the study of alternative market mechanisms.4 As is often the case with new fields of research, the methodological reflections on the experimental endeavor have lagged behind the rapid growth and the various uses and applications of experimental tools and results. Methodological debate might have been held back by the strong skepticism toward laboratory experimentation...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.