The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology

Edited by John B. Davis and D. Wade Hands

Bringing together a collection of leading contributors to this new methodological thinking, the authors explain how it differs from the past and point towards further concerns and future issues. The recent research programs explored include behavioral and experimental economics, neuroeconomics, new welfare theory, happiness and subjective well-being research, geographical economics, complexity and computational economics, agent-based modeling, evolutionary thinking, macroeconomics and Keynesianism after the crisis, and new thinking about the status of the economics profession and the role of the media in economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Agent-based Modeling: The Right Mathematics for the Social Sciences?

Paul L. Borrill and Leigh Tesfatsion


11 Agent-based modeling: the right mathematics for the social sciences? Paul L. Borrill and Leigh Tesfatsion 11.1 INTRODUCTION As in the physical sciences, theoretical modeling in the social sciences typically entails the specification and analysis of parameterized systems of differential equations. Many critical insights have been obtained by social scientists using this powerful classical mathematics approach. Nevertheless, it is extremely difficult to capture physical, institutional and behavioral aspects of social systems with empirical fidelity and still retain analytical tractability. Entities in social systems are neither infinitesimally small nor infinitely many, nor are their identities or behaviors necessarily indistinguishable from one another. Common simplifications, such as assumed homogeneous behaviors or the existence of single representative agents, are thus problematic. Moreover, the social sciences cannot separate observers from ‘the real world out there’. Rather, social scientists must consider multiple observers in a continual co-evolving interaction with each other and with their environment. This leads us to question whether other forms of traditional mathematics, or even new forms of mathematics, might better serve the purposes of social scientists. In short, what is the ‘right’ mathematics for the social sciences? Moreover, if a ‘right’ mathematics exists for the social sciences, what are the implications for the physical sciences? And what can the social and physical sciences learn from each other? As elaborated in Bridges (2009), constructive mathematics is distinguished from classical mathematics by the strict interpretation of ‘there exists’ (E) as ‘we can construct’, classical mathematicans accept the law of the excluded middle (LEM)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.