The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology

Edited by John B. Davis and D. Wade Hands

Bringing together a collection of leading contributors to this new methodological thinking, the authors explain how it differs from the past and point towards further concerns and future issues. The recent research programs explored include behavioral and experimental economics, neuroeconomics, new welfare theory, happiness and subjective well-being research, geographical economics, complexity and computational economics, agent-based modeling, evolutionary thinking, macroeconomics and Keynesianism after the crisis, and new thinking about the status of the economics profession and the role of the media in economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: The Spontaneous Methodology of Orthodoxy, and Other Economists’ Afflictions in the Great Recession

Philip Mirowski


Philip Mirowski 20.1 AN ANATOMY OF CHAGRIN It is never a life-affirming experience to be the guest of honor at a statusdegradation ceremony; but ever since Plato and Boethius, one source of solicitude has been the consolations of philosophy. A grounding in philosophy has often permitted those of a contemplative turn to weather the brickbats and reversals of cruel fate. One may disagree or not with such notions of the nobility of stoicism, but the spectacle of victims deficient in such consolations flailing away at their fate must be conceded a less edifying phenomenon. It may also constitute a topic in cognitive psychology, something we shall explore shortly. This chapter contemplates one such disaster, the reactions of the economics profession to the economic crisis which began in 2007. No sane person could welcome a worldwide economic contraction; but the economics profession was particularly vulnerable to scorn and derision with its onset, because the orthodox majority had been boasting of unprecedented success in guaranteeing prosperity during the first decade of the millennium, often under the rubric of ‘The Great Moderation’.1 Furthermore, the economists had grown so confident in their orthodoxy that they had driven out most rival views and approaches from the richest and most powerful academic settings. This relative homogeneity of their disciplinary convictions helped to set the stage for what has become a rolling come-uppance. Once the contraction proceeded in earnest in 2008, it became commonplace in newspapers, blogs and symposia at various universities to query openly why these...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.