Global Copyright
Show Less

Global Copyright

Three Hundred Years Since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace

Edited by Lionel Bently, Uma Suthersanen and Paul Torremans

This innovative book celebrates the tri-centenary of modern copyright, which began with the enactment of the Statute of Anne by the British Parliament in 1709, and was soon followed by other copyright legislation abroad. The Statute of Anne is traditionally claimed to be the world’s first copyright statute, and is thus viewed as the origin of a system of national laws that today exists in virtually all countries of the world. However, this book illustrates that while there is some truth in this claim, it is also important to treat it with caution.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: Problem or Solution? Mass Digitisation of Library Stocks and the Google Book Settlement

Christian Sprang


Christian Sprang* 1 INTRODUCTION Opening up complete library stocks for online uses is one of the greatest challenges presented to the book industry by the nascent twenty-first century – not only from a technical viewpoint, but from a legal viewpoint as well. There is hardly a better time for the ALAI to deal with this issue than a few months before the decision of the District Court in New York on a final approval of the Google Book Settlement. In this contribution, I would like to investigate the question of whether it is recommendable, from the viewpoint of Copyright Law, to expand the concept of mass digitisation and online inclusion of books developed by the parties to the Google Book Settlement, which is currently limited to the United States, to the rest of the world. In this discussion, I will be addressing the following aspects: ● ● ● Does it make sense, when digitising books protected by copyright, to distinguish according to whether the books are commercially available or not? Should the author of an out-of-print book be entitled to copyright as an exclusive right (opt-in solution), or is it sufficient if the owner of the copyright can prevent the digitisation of the out-of-print book (opt-out solution)? Is the solution for the online embedment of ‘orphan books’ offered by Google appropriate from an objective standpoint? * Dr Christian Sprang, Justiziar/Senior Legal Counsel, Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels. 285 286 ● Global copyright Is the planned Book Rights Registry helpful or dangerous, from the viewpoint of copyright...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.