European Competition Law: The Impact of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 102
Show Less

European Competition Law: The Impact of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 102

Edited by Lorenzo Federico Pace

This timely book, with contributions from prominent experts including Luis Ortiz Blanco, Valentine Korah, Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker, Lorenzo F. Pace and Richard Whish, examines the novel aspects of the 2009 Guidance on Article 102. They present a critical assessment of the Guidance that could be relevant to the result of the ongoing Commission’s investigations, for example, the opened procedure against Google.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings: From Protecting Freedom to Enter a Market to an Efficient Allocation of Resources to Increase Consumer Welfare

Valentine Korah


Valentine Korah INTRODUCTION 1 Two basic models of the function of competition law have influenced the thinking of the Commission of the European Community (EC). The first is the Ordoliberal view of freedom, adopted in reaction to Nazi tyranny and the power of the cartels: freedom from state power and from powerful firms. In this view, it is impossible to tell whether the outcome of conduct by a dominant firm (Domco) would be efficient. Whether a particular price is efficient depends on the preferences of consumers, usually unknown until after the price is fixed. This can be determined only by competition free from restraints.1 The Ordoliberals accepted the view that one of the functions of competition is to produce an efficient allocation of resources for the benefit of consumers. In contrast to many economists today and recent statements from the Commission, however, the Ordoliberals did not accept that ‘good outcomes’ were the sole purpose of competition law. They were concerned also about the accumulation of political See Friedrich August von Hayek, ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’, in Chiaki Nishiyama and Kurt R. Leube (eds), The Essence of Hayek (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA, 1984), Chapter 13. 8 1 M2541 - PACE PRINT.indd 8 04/03/2011 13:16 Guidance on Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in applying Article 82 9 power by the state and private firms, which they feared would result from inadequate competition. The second model focuses on the probable effects on the market as the sole criterion of competition. This is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.