European Competition Law: The Impact of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 102
Show Less

European Competition Law: The Impact of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 102

Edited by Lorenzo Federico Pace

This timely book, with contributions from prominent experts including Luis Ortiz Blanco, Valentine Korah, Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker, Lorenzo F. Pace and Richard Whish, examines the novel aspects of the 2009 Guidance on Article 102. They present a critical assessment of the Guidance that could be relevant to the result of the ongoing Commission’s investigations, for example, the opened procedure against Google.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Anticipated Enforcement in France of the Commission’s Guidance on Article 82

Catherine Prieto


Catherine Prieto INTRODUCTION 1 In France, the Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 EC is not seen as a radical change, but rather as a slow and constantly maturing process. For many years, those working on modernizing European competition policy have recommended an effectsbased approach instead of an excessively formalistic approach. In France, as well as in other European member states, debates have been heated. The main drawback is well known: a lack of legal certainty for undertakings as a result of a required auto-evaluation. But the benefit is considerable: greater efficiency thanks to improved and better-targeted implementation. The Commission’s objective has been properly understood, namely to find the right balance to limit the drawbacks as much as possible. In this regard, the development of commitments made the changes more acceptable to undertakings, and their lawyers in France have seized the advantages of this new kind of negotiated regulation. In contrast with static legal certainty, what we have now is a dynamic process in which the undertaking progressively produces its own legal certainty. But undertakings have to learn how to negotiate with the competition authorities as soon as a competition law concern is expressed. Unilateral practices are the last area to be concerned by this inexorable movement towards a modern economic approach. Thus, the content of the Guidance did not come as a surprise in French competition circles. It was more the delay in its publication which was irritating. Enforcement of the Guidance had already been...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.