Community and the Law
Show Less

Community and the Law

A Critical Reassessment of American Liberalism and Japanese Modernity

Takao Tanase

Edited by Luke Nottage and Leon Wolff

This important book translates seven landmark essays by one of Japan’s most respected and influential legal thinkers. While Takao Tanase concedes that law might not matter as much in Japan as it does in the United States, in a provocative challenge to socio-legal researchers and comparative lawyers, he asks: why should it? The issue, he contends, is not whether law matters to society; it is how society matters to law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Rights and Community

Takao Tanase


1. AMBIVALENCE ABOUT RIGHTS The language of ‘rights’ is almost ubiquitous. From unimpeded access to natural light, a clean environment and smoke-free living, to privacy and selfdetermination, we increasingly assert our ‘rights’ to protect ourselves from what we think are unfair violations of our freedoms or personal interests. We hear ‘human rights’ discussed in the mass media on an almost daily basis. We subject the bureaucracy to more searching scrutiny by asserting our ‘right to know’. Yet despite this general acceptance of rights, we still steel ourselves before insisting upon our rights in real-life situations. This is because it feels awkward, if not outright uncomfortable, claiming our own rights or disclaiming the rights of others. Why are we ambivalent to rights? Is it due to an underdeveloped rights consciousness? Or perhaps self-interested opportunism, where we agree on the general principle but oppose its application in particular settings? I suspect something else is involved. To be sure, rights are worth protecting and we should expect new categories of rights to develop to safeguard new interests. Yet appeals to rights also have a destructive force: they interrupt the flow of everyday social interaction and create tensions in social relationships. Although influential scholars such as Kawashima (1982a, pp. 112–17) argue that rights assertion is essential to fostering a healthy respect for rights in society, this is not always true. Indeed, sceptics might point to the negative side to rights assertion – where asserting rights has little, if anything, to do with ensuring respect...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.