Governance in a Disenchanted World
Show Less

Governance in a Disenchanted World

The End of Moral Society

Helmut Willke

This book expounds the idea of a disenchanted world composed of nation states and global functional systems. The nation state is losing some of its regulatory prerogatives and, at the same time, extending its legitimacy base in ‘chains of legitimacy’ to transnational institutions. There is neither a global democracy nor a global government. Therefore, establishing alternative forms of legitimacy, accountability and participation in a secular world seem mandatory. Helmut Willke examines the resurgence of moral reasoning in global affairs, pushed by various fundamentalisms, that indicates a real danger of a regression of democracy. The separation of private morals and public policies, the book argues, remains the basis of global aspirations of democracy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 5: Global Law and the Cases for Social Responsibilities

Helmut Willke

Extract

5. Global law and the cases for social responsibilities Rule of law and democracy are not exactly a global reality. It is premature, therefore, to speak of global law in the sense of modern positive law, legitimated by formal democratic procedures. Still, a hybrid ‘global law’ is evolving which encompasses different kinds of rules and rule systems. Globally operating law firms, investment banks, rating institutions, sports commissions, environmental movements, accrediting institutes for universities, the ILO for global labor standards and so forth, have more influence on the creation, development and guidance of transnational regimes of rule-making, including ethical rules and rules impinging on public and private morality, than do most national legislative bodies. A ‘lex mercatoria’ based on private global networks is overshadowing and at times deforming the rule systems of nation-states. It has permeated technical standards, professional rules, performance criteria, mediation and arbitration, court procedures, constructions of human rights, environmental protection standards and other fields of regulation with an apparent international and global range (Mertens 1997). Taken together, ‘technical standardization, professional rule production, human rights, intra-organizational regulation in multinational enterprises, contracting arbitration and other institutions of lex mercatoria are forms of rule-making by “private governments” which have appeared on a massive global scale’ (Teubner 1997: xiii). These actors and institutions of global rule-making constitute a fragmented, decentralized and pluralistic discourse about domain-specific rules, but there is no pretense of creating a singular, encompassing and collectively binding set of rules, comparable to national (democratic) law. Functional differentiation is a decisive...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.