The Provision of Public Services in Europe
Show Less

The Provision of Public Services in Europe

Between State, Local Government and Market

Edited by Hellmut Wollmann and Gérard Marcou

The book is the first of its kind to provide a comparative analysis of the provision of social and public services in France, Italy, Germany, the UK and Norway.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The Multi-level Institutional Setting in Germany, Italy, France and the UK: A Comparative Overview

Hellmut Wollmann, Enzo Balboni, Jean-Pierre Gaudin and Gérard Marcou


Hellmut Wollmann, Enzo Balboni, Jean-Pierre Gaudin and Gérard Marcou This chapter reviews the multi-level institutional architecture of Germany, France, Italy and the UK. This ‘mapping’ provides institutional orientation and guidance for the following studies on the provision of public and social services in the four countries under discussion. GERMANY Federal Level Germany’s two-tier federal system comprises the federal level and 16 Länder or states, including three city states (Berlin, Hamburg, Bremen). The Länder have an average population of 5.2 million, ranging from 18 million (North Rhine–Westphalia) to 550 000 (Bremen) (see Table 2.1, line 1). Under the Federal Constitution (Grundgesetz) of 1949, the ‘social state’ (Sozialstaat) revolves around ‘human dignity’ (Würde des Menschen) and the ‘equality’ (Gleichheit) of every citizen, and is at the core of the ‘democratic and social federal state’ (Article 20).1 Federal legislation is constitutionally mandated (Article 72 II) to ‘ensure equal living conditions (gleichwertige Lebensbedingungen) on the territory of the Republic’. This has been widely interpreted as laying the foundations for what has been termed a ‘unitary federal state’ (unitarischer Bundesstaat) (Hesse, 1967). Under the complicated constitutional distinction between exclusive legislative competence (assigned either to the federation or the Länder) and concurrent (konkurrierende) legislative powers (which the federal level has generally come to exercise), the federal level has attained and held the primacy in legislation and policy-making. However, federal predominance is somewhat curbed by a vertical division of power and ‘checks and balances’. For example, 15 Table 2.1 Levels...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.