Chapter 5: Defending the history of economic thought
The aim of this book is to explain the importance of the history of economic thought in the curriculum of economists. A book like this would not have had to be written if this were the consensus view amongst economists, but more importantly, it would not have had to be written if the continuation of HET within the study of economics were not under serious and on-going threat. The history of eco- nomic thought has two somewhat contradictory kinds of opposition. First of all, there are those mainstream economists who would like to end the challenge to the authority of textbook economics that HET allows to continue. And then there are those who themselves value HET but because it is not actively supported by the main- stream would like to see it become less of a challenge to the mainstream or even removed as a sub-discipline of economics and the study continued as part of the history of sciences in general. Although in most ways the two groups have little in common, the outcome they seek is largely the same. There have been two major attempts to remove HET as an active component in the study of economics, one in Australia in 2007 and the second in Europe in 2011. Both failed, but only narrowly and at the eleventh hour. I was closely involved in both cases and it is those experiences that have motivated the writing of this book. Both episodes might have been related to particular moments in time,
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.