Handbook of Employee Engagement
Show Less

Handbook of Employee Engagement

Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice

Edited by Simon L. Albrecht

The Handbook presents comprehensive and global perspectives to help researchers and practitioners identify, understand, evaluate and apply the key theories, models, measures and interventions associated with employee engagement. It provides many new insights, practical applications and areas for future research. It will serve as an important platform for ongoing research and practice on employee engagement.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Engagement as a Motivational Construct

Ilke Inceoglu and Steven Fleck


Ilke Inceoglu and Steven Fleck Introduction A “motivated” workforce is clearly viewed as desirable in any organization, especially when it is facing more pressure to perform and increase organizational effectiveness. In this context, employee motivation and in particular work engagement have become popular concepts that are widely discussed and applied by human resources (HR) practitioners, consultancy firms and survey companies. When practitioners and academics discuss work motivation, however, they tend to refer to different meanings of the term, ranging from being motivated by something (motivators), the actual feeling of being motivated (engagement), to the effort employees put into their work (motivated behavior). This confusion is heightened by the fact that the term “engagement” itself is often not properly defined (Macey & Schneider, 2008). As a result, practitioners are left to wonder about the difference between engagement and motivation and the value of measuring either or both in applied settings. The objective of this chapter is to clarify the meanings of engagement and motivation and their relationships with each other by placing them in a motivational framework. Efforts to define engagement and delineate it from other constructs should prompt revisiting conceptualizations of motivation which are often ambiguous. Contemporary theoretical models and debates in motivational research (see, for example, Kanfer et al., 2008) offer approaches that help to clarify what we mean by motivation. The engagement model proposed in the chapter by Fleck and Inceoglu (ch. 3, this volume) can be viewed as a motivational continuum, with stable, dispositional motivation at one pole...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.