Handbook of Employee Engagement
Show Less

Handbook of Employee Engagement

Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice

Edited by Simon L. Albrecht

The Handbook presents comprehensive and global perspectives to help researchers and practitioners identify, understand, evaluate and apply the key theories, models, measures and interventions associated with employee engagement. It provides many new insights, practical applications and areas for future research. It will serve as an important platform for ongoing research and practice on employee engagement.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: The Personal Side of Engagement: The Influence of Personality Factors

Cristina de Mello e Souza Wildermuth


Cristina de Mello e Souza Wildermuth Introduction If we are truly interested in a personal connection to work, shouldn’t we measure the person instead? (Ed Gubman, 2004) We must bring the person to the engagement debate. This was the gist of the argument made by business consultant Ed Gubman (2004) in “From engagement to passion for work: the search for the missing person”. Gubman argued that current discussions on engagement involve two components: where the person works and what the person does. Additionally, organizations should start focusing on who the person is. William Kahn’s (1990) landmark study on engagement did not have a direct focus on the person. Instead, Kahn sought to understand the powerful psychological conditions that could “survive the gamut of individual differences” (p. 695). Kahn identified three such conditions: meaningfulness (the perceived “worth” of engaging at work), safety (how safe it is to be oneself at work), and availability of resources, both emotional and physical, to perform one’s duties. Kahn did, however, acknowledge that individual differences might influence the kinds of roles employees find engaging or disengaging as well as personal experiences of meaningfulness, safety, and availability of resources. Additionally, Schaufeli and Bakker (2003) described engagement as a relatively “persistent and pervasive affective–cognitive state” (p. 4). Such a longer-term conceptualization of engagement seems to suggest at least some level of connection between engagement and the makeup of the individual – the potential impact of the person on engagement. This chapter addresses the personal side of engagement. Specifically,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.