Law, Economics and Evolutionary Theory
Show Less

Law, Economics and Evolutionary Theory

Edited by Peer Zumbansen and Gralf-Peter Calliess

Law and economics has arguably become one of the most influential theories in contemporary legal theory and adjudication. The essays in this volume, authored by both legal scholars and economists, constitute lively and critical engagements between law and economics and new institutional economics from the perspectives of legal and evolutionary theory. The result is a fresh look at core concepts in law and economics – such as ‘institutions’, ‘institutional change’ and ‘market failure‘ – that offer new perspectives on the relationship between economic and legal governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Making Evolutionary Theory Useful for Legal Actors

Mauro Zamboni


Mauro Zamboni* As pointed out by many scholars, there is a general skeptical attitude of a large sector of the legal scholarship towards the evolutionary approach.1 The main objective of this chapter is to make the first step in the direction of making evolutionary theory more useful for and therefore sympathetic to lawyers and legal actors in general. This step consists in elevating evolutionary theory from the status of external investigation of the legal phenomenon to being a fundamental contributor to the legal discourse also in its normative parts. The focus in particular is to understand why, though the evolutionary theory approach to law has been around quite a while in the legal scholar’s discussion, the legal world has left it at the front step of the legal house.2 Based on this analysis, the task is also to evaluate whether it is possible, after certain adjustments, to invite evolutionary theory into the larger family of legal thinking, in particular as part of the legal theories of law-making. As stressed by many critiques, it is possible to detect in most of the evolutionary approaches to the law some hidden normative components.3 For example, when using statements such as ‘legal uniformity . . . should to a large extent come about in an organic way,’ evolutionary scholars implicitly assume a normative proposal (i.e. that ‘the organic way ought to be pursued’) while, at the same time, they hide the criteria according to which this proposal is preferable to another (if the ‘organic way’ is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.