The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance
Show Less

The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance

Edited by Udo Diedrichs, Wulf Reiners and Wolfgang Wessels

This book brings together the research of different academic disciplines to explore the recent transformation of governance in the European Union. The emergence, execution and evolution of new modes of EU governance across several policy fields – encompassing all three former pillars of the European Union – are mapped, analysed and evaluated. In particular, the contributors focus on the ways in which these innovative mechanisms and practices relate to ‘old’ methods of governance and what their implications are for both the effectiveness and efficiency of policy-making. Particular attention is devoted to the impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the shape of EU governance. Conclusions are drawn in the form of an integrated framework that explores the dynamics and differentiation of EU governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Classifying and Mapping the OMC in Different Policy Areas

Colin Shaw


Colin Shaw INTRODUCTION Before assessing the impact of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) on actual policies, it is worth noting its impact on the academic community, notably but not exclusively on those scholars who focus on European ‘governance’. For these thinkers the OMC was, arguably, a ‘godsend’. Two features guaranteed its importance to these researchers: first, it was ‘new’, that is a self-proclaimed and well-defined departure from existing practice that could be studied in situ and whose impact could be measured against the ‘old’ system. Second, it was clearly ‘governance’, that is a set of practices that worked outside the strictures of ‘government’ (in the case of the European Union, the legislative process) and whose methods were more open, experimental and potentially effective. The OMC was therefore seized upon by numerous researchers because of its promise of innovation in the field of European policy-making (new instruments) and because it seemed to extend the boundaries of policy-making to new areas traditionally beyond its realm (new policies). Changing and extending the scope of European integration seemed to be the early promise of the OMC. Hundreds of speculative papers immediately attempted to describe the potential importance of the method. Not only did the method itself seem to proliferate widely (as we shall see below), but interest in it grew as scholars sought to analyse the first findings of the many empirical studies that accompanied its launch. There was, and to a certain extent still is, an ‘OMC bubble’ – an over-emphasis on its...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.