The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance
Show Less

The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance

Edited by Udo Diedrichs, Wulf Reiners and Wolfgang Wessels

This book brings together the research of different academic disciplines to explore the recent transformation of governance in the European Union. The emergence, execution and evolution of new modes of EU governance across several policy fields – encompassing all three former pillars of the European Union – are mapped, analysed and evaluated. In particular, the contributors focus on the ways in which these innovative mechanisms and practices relate to ‘old’ methods of governance and what their implications are for both the effectiveness and efficiency of policy-making. Particular attention is devoted to the impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the shape of EU governance. Conclusions are drawn in the form of an integrated framework that explores the dynamics and differentiation of EU governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: The Pensions OMC: Why Did it Emerge and How Has it Evolved?

David Natali


David Natali INTRODUCTION This chapter aims to shed light on the emergence within the European Union of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) in the field of pensions. It does so by using the concept of window of opportunity (related to a revised ‘garbage can’ model). While that concept has usually been proposed for the analysis of agenda-setting and policy change (Keeler, 1993; Kingdon, 1995; Zahariadis, 2003), in this chapter it is used for the study of the introduction of new modes of governance1 (NMGs) and to answer two more specific questions. First, why did the Pensions OMC emerge? And, second, how did it evolve? The proposed model seems useful for at least three reasons. First, it allows for a multi-dimensional and multi-level analytical framework. From a descriptive perspective, it provides a wide map of multiple socioeconomic, institutional and political factors (some of them related to elements of chance and human creativity) which affected the launch of the coordination process in the field. These forces, originating at both national and supranational level, led to a window of opportunity and then to an NMG. From a theoretical point of view, this allows for the combination of some of the traditional theories of European integration (neo-functionalism, new institutionalism and intergovernmentalism). As Peterson and Bomberg (1999: 9) have argued, the EU is ‘heavily nuanced, constantly changing and even kaleidoscopic’ and thus resists simple characterizations and/or a general theory. Consistently, the following framework draws on the interaction of different theories.2 Second, the model helps...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.