A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition
Show Less

A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Edited by Ruth Towse

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Artistic Freedom

Michael Rushton


Michael Rushton The economic analysis of freedom of expression has primarily developed through the ‘law and economics’ tradition that plays down any consideration of abstract rights (‘nonsense upon stilts’) and instead looks for legal frameworks that maximize aggregate wealth, broadly defined. Richard Posner (1986) provides a systematic approach to freedom of expression based on a cost–benefit framework first articulated by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. Dennis (183 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1950)). By this model restriction of freedom of expression is justified when V + E < PL / (1+i)n where V is the social loss from suppressing valuable information, E is the legal-error cost of trying to distinguish which expression is valuable and which is not, P is the probability that harm will occur if the expression is allowed, L is the cost if the harm occurs, i is the discount rate, and n is the amount of time between potentially harmful expression and the occurrence of the loss resulting from it. The left-hand side of the inequality is the cost of suppressing expression, and the right-hand side is the probable cost if the expression is allowed. We can observe Posner’s application of the economic approach in his rulings as Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In Miller v. Civil City of South Bend (904 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1990)), Posner ruled that a municipal ordinance banning nude dancing should not be allowed, on the grounds that the harm of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.