A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition
Show Less

A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Edited by Ruth Towse

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 39: Motion Pictures

Darlene C Chisholm


Darlene C. Chisholm1 From an economist’s perspective, the history, market structure and production chain characterizing the motion-pictures industry present fascinating puzzles and illustrate central principles of economic theory. The objective of this chapter is to outline some of the key economic phenomena that characterize the motion-pictures industry by examining the economic history of the industry, and by exploring the economics underlying the production, distribution and exhibition of motion pictures. Industry history By 1930, the US motion-pictures industry was dominated by five major studios: MGM, Paramount, RKO, Twentieth-Century Fox and Warner Brothers. The production process among these leaders was characterized by full vertical integration, with studios controlling film production, distribution and exhibition.2 Each studio maintained a roster of actors and actresses who agreed to perform exclusively in films produced by that studio. The long-term contracts into which the actors and studios entered formed the basis of the Studio System. Access to a constant supply of talent guaranteed the studios control over a constant flow of films. The studios’ control over distribution, and the preferential treatment the studio-owned movie theatres received in acquiring films, led to a significant degree of industry dominance by the major studios. During the 1930s, studio-owned theatres were granted favourable clearances and other advantageous terms from studio distributors to exhibit studio-produced films. The extensive vertical integration by the major studios led to allegations of anticompetitive practices. In 1938, the Department of Justice initiated a series of actions against the major studios3 on behalf of non-studio exhibitors, who claimed...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.