A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition
Show Less

A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Edited by Ruth Towse

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 59: Theatre

Daniel Urrutiaguer


Daniel Urrutiaguer In Ancient Greece, the state controlled and financed theatrical activities in order to celebrate Dionysus. In Western Europe, the dependence of the arts on the Church has weakened since the Renaissance with the professionalization of companies. Royal court patronage promoted an academic production of tragedies whereas an interest for comedies or bourgeois dramas grew in the eighteenth century. The development of a private market is related to the social recognition of the playwrights’ originality. The popular taste for spectacular and stars’ ham acting drove highbrow directors to develop naturalistic or symbolic forms on stage at the end of the nineteenth century, while modern authors broke the psychological unity of characters. Following Bernheim (1932), Leroy (1990) distinguishes the ‘stock system’, where a ‘director-cum-manager’ heads a permanent company, from the ‘combination system’, where directors assemble artists for each production on an ad hoc basis. Because of the ‘industrial revolution’ on the stage, the combination system has grown since 1875 in the USA and since the early twentieth century in France. French subsidies for new staging of an existing work or the creation of new theatrical works and indirect grants with specific unemployment benefit for ‘intermittent’ artists and technicians stimulate the splitting up of theatrical production within an economic system of short-run shows. Germany or Russia is closer to the ‘stock system’ with permanent companies in state-owned and -managed theatres. The proportion of public subsidies in the total income contrasts with the North American and UK systems where private contributions have...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.