A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition
Show Less

A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Edited by Ruth Towse

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 60: Welfare Economics

Mark Blaug


Mark Blaug The arts are subsidized to some extent in every country in the world and yet the standard tools of welfare economics do not readily provide convincing arguments for public funding of the arts. Typically, economists base a case for public subsidies of a sector or industry on the existence of ‘market failure’, meaning a violation of one or more of the conditions for competitive efficiency. The most frequently cited examples of market failure are (1) ‘externalities’ or ‘spillovers’, whether of production or of consumption; (2) ‘economies of scale’, such that unit costs fall as output increases; (3) ‘public goods’, that is goods that are non-rivalrous in consumption and non-excludable in their benefits; and (4) endemic consumer ignorance about technically complex goods as, for example, the demand for healthcare. When it comes to the arts, however, these are frequently supplemented by special arguments about (1) ‘equality of opportunity’, according to which cultural goods are necessarily ‘experience goods’, that is, goods that are demanded only by those who have inadvertently experienced them; and (2) the ‘option value’ of a cultural heritage maintained at public expense across the generations; and (3) the straightforward, selfdemonstrable ‘merit’ of the arts independent of any instrumental value (see Baumol, Chapter 1 in the present volume). It does appear, therefore, that we need something more than standard welfare economics if we are going to talk meaningfully about an economic rationale for public funding of the arts. I label this ‘something more’ Pigovian welfare economics to distinguish...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.