Handbook of Intuition Research
Show Less

Handbook of Intuition Research

Edited by Marta Sinclair

This groundbreaking interdisciplinary Handbook showcases the latest intuition research, providing an integrated framework that reconciles opposing views on what intuition is and how it works. The internationally renowned group of contributors explores different facets of the intuiting process and its outcome, the role of consciousness and affect in intuition, and alternate ways of capturing it. They tackle the function of intuition in expertise, strategy, entrepreneurship, and ethics and outline intuitive decision-making in the legal profession, medicine, film and wine industry, and teaching. The Handbook pushes the boundaries of our current understanding by exploring the possibility of non-local intuition based on the principles of quantum holography and investigating new techniques for developing intuitive skills.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: The Role of Intuition in Ethical Decision Making

James Richard Guzak and M. Blake Hargrove


James Richard Guzak and M. Blake Hargrove Ethical decision making has been an important area of theoretical and empirical work within the field of organizational behavior for the past 25 years. To date, most of this work has focused on rationality as the basis of most ethical decisions, while relatively little research attention has centered on the role intuition plays in ethical decisions (Haidt, 2001; Reynolds, 2006; Sonenshein, 2007). The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief review of the most important theories of ethical decision making within the field, to provide a more in-depth review of the potential importance of non-cognitive intuitive modes of ethical decision making, and to propose some potential opportunities for further research. The theoretical underpinning for modern ethical decision-making research stems from Rest’s (1986) foundational work which suggests that people move sequentially along a four-step process of moral decision making. These steps include (i) moral awareness – being able to interpret the situation as being moral; (ii) moral judgment – deciding which course of action is morally right; (iii) moral intent – prioritizing moral values over other values; and (iv) moral behavior – executing and implementing the moral intention. Subsequent empirical research in ethical decision making has primarily focused on testing Rest’s four steps as dependent measures. Various researchers have offered independent variables emphasizing individual constructs, organizational constructs, and Jones’s (1991) moral intensity construct (Ford & Richardson, 1994; Loe et al., 2000; McDevitt et al., 2007; O’Fallon & Butterfield, 2005). Rest’s (1986) four-step model suggests a description of a...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.