Handbook of Intuition Research
Show Less

Handbook of Intuition Research

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Marta Sinclair

This groundbreaking interdisciplinary Handbook showcases the latest intuition research, providing an integrated framework that reconciles opposing views on what intuition is and how it works. The internationally renowned group of contributors explores different facets of the intuiting process and its outcome, the role of consciousness and affect in intuition, and alternate ways of capturing it. They tackle the function of intuition in expertise, strategy, entrepreneurship, and ethics and outline intuitive decision-making in the legal profession, medicine, film and wine industry, and teaching. The Handbook pushes the boundaries of our current understanding by exploring the possibility of non-local intuition based on the principles of quantum holography and investigating new techniques for developing intuitive skills.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 12: The Critical Decisions Vortex – Interplay of Intuition, Reason, and Emotion: Comparison of Three Dynamic Industries

Jean-Francois Coget

Extract

12 The critical decisions vortex – interplay of intuition, reason, and emotion: comparison of three dynamic industries Jean-Francois Coget The rational decision-making paradigm has dominated research in decision making for years. Rational decision making is typically described as (i) defining a problem, (ii) identifying relevant criteria dimensions of the problem, (iii) weighing the different criteria in terms of importance, (iv) generating alternative solutions that address the problem, (v) rating each alternative on the relevant criteria, and (vi) choosing the optimal solution (Bazerman, 1998; Kahneman et al., 1987; Simon, 1968). Rational decisionmaking models have been widely used in economics, management science, sociology, and political science (March, 1991). One of their main benefits is that they allow researchers to model human behavior with a high degree of mathematical formality. They are at the heart of such popular models as game theory (Von Neuman & Morgenstern, 1944) or expectancy theory (Vroom & McCrimmon, 1968). In spite of their popularity, these models have been criticized for imposing norms such as rationality, conscious and effortful analysis, and choice that individuals often deviate from in practice. Simon’s work (1968), for instance, has demonstrated that cognitive limits make it impossible for people to gather complete information and find the optimal solution to a problem. In practice, their rationality is bounded. Kahneman and Tversky (1979) further showed that individuals rely on heuristics that systematically bias their judgment even when they are not overloaded cognitively. Recently, an alternative model of intuitive decision making has captured the attention of management scholars. It is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.