Handbook of Intuition Research
Show Less

Handbook of Intuition Research

Edited by Marta Sinclair

This groundbreaking interdisciplinary Handbook showcases the latest intuition research, providing an integrated framework that reconciles opposing views on what intuition is and how it works. The internationally renowned group of contributors explores different facets of the intuiting process and its outcome, the role of consciousness and affect in intuition, and alternate ways of capturing it. They tackle the function of intuition in expertise, strategy, entrepreneurship, and ethics and outline intuitive decision-making in the legal profession, medicine, film and wine industry, and teaching. The Handbook pushes the boundaries of our current understanding by exploring the possibility of non-local intuition based on the principles of quantum holography and investigating new techniques for developing intuitive skills.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Legal Intuition and Expertise

Andreas Glöckner and Irena D. Ebert


Andreas Glöckner and Irena D. Ebert When I became more familiar with the practices in admiralty and in equity, more especially when, a judge in such cases, I felt the restless, eager ranging of the mind to overcome the confusion and the perplexities of the evidence, or of constricting and outworn concepts, and so to find the hidden truth, I knew that not only was it the practice of good judges to ‘feel’ their way to a decision of a close and difficult case, but that in such cases any other practice was unsound. (Hutcheson, 1929: 277) Considering the extensive consequences caused by legal decisions, both practitioners and scholars have dealt with the question of the perfect route to valid legal decisions. That is, how should legal decisions be made? Hutcheson (1929), a chief federal judge of the US 5th Circuit, describes his radical change of mind concerning this question. While starting from the position that all legal reasoning has to be based on logic and deliberate information processes he later came to the conclusion that ‘hunches’ or ‘feelings’ play a crucial role and are even necessary for appropriate decision making in difficult legal cases. Guthrie et al. (2007) have shown that judges heavily rely on intuition. In a set of studies, they used deviations from rational behavior to trace intuition and to identify its downsides (cf. Kahneman et al., 1982). The authors revealed that judges tend to select intuitive (but wrong) answers in the Cognitive Reflection Test (Frederick,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.