Handbook of Intuition Research
Show Less

Handbook of Intuition Research

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Marta Sinclair

This groundbreaking interdisciplinary Handbook showcases the latest intuition research, providing an integrated framework that reconciles opposing views on what intuition is and how it works. The internationally renowned group of contributors explores different facets of the intuiting process and its outcome, the role of consciousness and affect in intuition, and alternate ways of capturing it. They tackle the function of intuition in expertise, strategy, entrepreneurship, and ethics and outline intuitive decision-making in the legal profession, medicine, film and wine industry, and teaching. The Handbook pushes the boundaries of our current understanding by exploring the possibility of non-local intuition based on the principles of quantum holography and investigating new techniques for developing intuitive skills.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 17: Resolving the Enigma of Nonlocal Intuition: A Quantum-Holographic Approach

Raymond Trevor Bradley


17 Resolving the enigma of nonlocal intuition: a quantum-holographic approach Raymond Trevor Bradley The Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler & Fowler, 1964: 639) defines intuition as ‘immediate apprehension by the mind without reasoning, immediate apprehension by a sense, and immediate insight’. Such intuitive experience is quite unlike that of normal conscious awareness, in which the mind’s contents are updated incrementally, as the sequences of sensory experience unfold (McCraty et al., 2004a). The dominant perspective on intuition is a cognitive approach: that intuitive perception is a function of the unconscious mind accessing existing information within the brain from prior experience (e.g., Agor, 1984; Laughlin, 1997; Lieberman, 2000; Mitchell et al., 2005, 2007; Myers, 2002; Simon, 1987). While there is little doubt that information from prior experience – both conscious and unconscious knowledge – is involved, there is, however, a persuasive body of experimental evidence for another informational basis for intuitive perception. This is the tacit information about remote or future events which is perceived and processed by the body’s psychophysiological systems. Yet despite the voluminous body of rigorous experimental research documenting such nonlocal communication as a scientific fact (Radin, 1997a; Bradley, 2007; Bradley et al., 2010a), the majority of mainstream scientists regard the findings of these studies as anomalous (Walach & Schmidt, 2005). Although such instances of ‘nonlocal intuition’ (La Pira & Gillin, 2006) appear to contradict the physical laws of causality, explaining how – the mechanisms and processes by which – such space/time-defying interaction occurs has not been possible until relatively recently. Three scientific developments provide the basis...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.