Fiduciary Finance
Show Less

Fiduciary Finance

Investment Funds and the Crisis in Financial Markets

Martin Gold

This multi-faceted analysis of institutional investment defines ‘fiduciary finance’ institutions as the third pillar of the financial system, alongside banks and insurers. It documents the role played by investment funds and the money management industry during the recent financial crisis, and provides an unashamedly critical review of the business disciplines which can dominate investment practices. It clarifies the economic significance of the investment industry (circa $60 trillion in assets) and the features which differentiate fiduciary finance from traditional financial institutions such as banks and insurers.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: The Science of Investment

Martin Gold


INTRODUCTION The legitimacy of the investment discipline is inextricably linked to its scientific credentials. Questioning the scientific status of investment, although controversial, is fundamentally important given the enormous scale of capital entrusted to financial fiduciaries, and society’s reliance upon financial markets to provide optimal economic outcomes. Even within the academy (and without incredulity induced by the episodic crises of financial markets) there is considerable skepticism about the practical value of research work. For example, Frankfurter and McGoun (1996, p. 5) assert that finance is ‘a social science masquerading as a natural science,’ arguing that its capacity to generate real knowledge (meaning) is diminished by the emphasis placed upon collecting data and statistical techniques which do not have sufficiently rigorous philosophical justification (that is, a scientific methodology).1 The emphasis on statistical/econometric methods used within the investment discipline does encourage a propensity for pseudo-scientific research, but this is an evergreen concern which also applies to economics and the other social sciences: Mayer (1933, p. 419), for example, enjoined scholars in economics, generally, to eschew ‘pseudo-scientific reasoning and sophistry.’ Ascertaining the scientific status of the investment discipline therefore requires a synthesis of the extant literature to address questions of epistemology (the scope of the research) and ontology (what knowledge has been derived). This is a necessarily complicated procedure that must take into account the relevant literature and the research methodologies employed. This chapter therefore classifies the extant literature according to the principal ‘research paradigms,’ and summarizes their respective research methods...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.