Research Handbook on the Economics of Corporate Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on the Economics of Corporate Law

Edited by Claire A. Hill and Brett H. McDonnell

Comprising essays specially commissioned for the volume, leading scholars who have shaped the field of corporate law and governance explore and critique developments in this vibrant and expanding area and offer possible directions for future research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: The Influence of Law and Economics on Law and Accounting: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back

Lawrence A. Cunningham


Lawrence A. Cunningham 1. THEORY Models and their Limits Under agency theory, shareholders are treated as principals and corporate managers as agents. The theory, elaborated since the 1970s, notes how interests of principals and agents diverge. The cost of controlling that divergence and the cost of the part that cannot be controlled are called agency costs (Jensen & Meckling 1976; Tirole 2006). Agency costs are limited by various markets, especially capital and corporate control markets. In the law and accounting context, divergence of interests between managers and shareholders can be further reduced by investing in monitoring devices, such as internal controls, board oversight, and independent auditing, and bonding devices, principally transparent accounting and financial disclosure. To evaluate agency costs and ways to reduce them, scholars sought a proxy to express the shareholder interest and manager actions in relation to it. They found it in the efficient capital market hypothesis (ECMH), cornerstone of modern finance theory. For centuries, shareholders were seen to be interested in maximization of profits and managerial performance was measured in those terms. Beginning in the 1960s, theorists saw stock market price as a proxy for the shareholder interest. They developed the ECMH, a hypothesis that stock price incorporates all public information about a firm, including accounting measures of profits, and supplies a measure of value. The ECMH thus also suggests that stock price incorporated agency costs: companies with higher stock prices are better managed, posing lower agency costs, than those with lower prices (all other things being equal)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.