The Sociology of Scientific Work
Show Less

The Sociology of Scientific Work The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society

The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society

  • PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy in Europe

Dominique Vinck

More than ever before, science and technology play a significant role in modern society as evidenced by the development of nanotechnologies and the controversies surrounding GMOs and climate change. This book comprehensively explores the flourishing field of science and technology studies and examines its creation, development and interaction with contemporary society.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: The Sciences as Collectives

Dominique Vinck

Extract

3 The sciences as collectives With Merton, science was studied as a unique, normative institution. The term ‘scientific community’ was coined in reference to the different parts making up science. However, Storer (1966) suggests that the normative structure does not go far enough to explain how these parts are integrated to form a whole. The internal organisation of science has to be taken into account too. This internal organisation projects an alternative image of science, as a set of different communities, which can be analysed in terms of profession or discipline. As we shall see, it is possible to go beyond these analyses by studying regimes of knowledge production. The Profession The scientific community can be seen as a series of specialised professions, each with its own internal organisation, in the same way as doctors, architects or lawyers belong to a specialised profession. To become autonomous, a profession has to have an internal organisation and be made up of members who are all eager to contribute to relations. In the case of medicine, there is a professional association and a formal deontology, but can the same be applied to scientific research? Storer (ibid.) saw within scientific specialities professions, inside which there are well-ordered and regulated links between members. The ethos of science cannot fully explain how these links are actually regulated as it does not cover the way members of a group are attached to the group’s norms. This attachment comes from the fact that researchers count on the upholding...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.