The Sociology of Scientific Work
Show Less

The Sociology of Scientific Work

The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society

Dominique Vinck

More than ever before, science and technology play a significant role in modern society as evidenced by the development of nanotechnologies and the controversies surrounding GMOs and climate change. This book comprehensively explores the flourishing field of science and technology studies and examines its creation, development and interaction with contemporary society.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content


Dominique Vinck


This manual has allowed us to explore a wide variety of approaches and issues relating to the study of science. It has underlined the importance and the thorny nature of the ever-increasing questions it raises. Some of these stem from the very dynamics of the sciences, as practices change according to the objects, instruments and forms of organisation involved. Moreover, they are inherently tied to what is happening in society today and the challenges facing it. Nevertheless, there are other questions arising from changes to the social study of science itself. The concluding paragraphs review some of the structural elements relating to these questions. Questions Arising from Recurrent Academic Debates In the debate about the relative autonomy of the institution of science and the independence of scientific knowledge with respect to social influences, some authors reaffirm the idea of a partially autonomous, immanent development of science. They underline the differential role of social and cognitive factors (or epistemic factors), and reject or reformulate the postulates of relativist and constructivist sociology. They develop a neoinstitutionalist sociology (Kreimer, 1997) or a socio-epistemology. Boudon and Clavelin (1994), for example, state that the position of Karl Mannheim, according to which certain (scientific) proposals are independent of the social context, is the only reasonable position to adopt. It recognises the influence of social factors on scientific development, but defends the idea that science is intrinsically objective. From this standpoint, the actornetwork theory (ANT) is reproached for its inability to differentiate and counterbalance the influence of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.