Unemployment, Recession and Effective Demand
Show Less

Unemployment, Recession and Effective Demand

The Contributions of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki

Claudio Sardoni

In the midst of the current world economic crisis, many claim there is a necessity to return to the Marxian and Keynesian traditions in order to better understand the dynamics of market economies. This book is an important step in that direction. It presents a critical examination of the foundations of macroeconomics as developed in the traditions of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki, which are contrasted with the current mainstream. Particular attention is given to the problem of market forms and their relevance for macroeconomics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 4: Keynes’s Critique of Say’s Law

Claudio Sardoni

Extract

4. Keynes’s critique of Say’s Law 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter is mainly devoted to present Keynes’s critique of Say’s Law and to point out the significant similarities to Marx’s own critique. However, before turning to consider these issues, a number of qualifications and clarifications are necessary. First of all, it is necessary to understand what Marx and Keynes meant by the term Say’s Law. Marx dealt with the law as expressed by Ricardo; Keynes, especially in The General Theory, criticized the law expressed in terms that appear quite foreign to the Ricardian formulation. Keynes’s criticism is addressed to what can be defined as the neoclassical version of Say’s Law. There are significant differences between the two versions of the law. It is then important to point out these differences. Section 4.2 is devoted to this topic and to Keynes’s criticism of Say’s Law as presented in The General Theory. Despite the differences in the definition of Say’s Law in classical and neoclassical economics, it is still true that there also exist important similarities and, for this, it is possible to find similarities between Marx’s and Keynes’s criticisms of the law. These similarities are easier to detect in writings of Keynes other than the final version of The General Theory. They are most evident in some earlier drafts of the book, where Keynes went as far as to use Marx’s formula (M – C– M´) to argue against the validity of Say’s Law. Section 4.3 deals...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.