The Contributions of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki
Appendix B: Effects of Wage Changes in Keynes’s Model
Proposition 1 At p = p* and r = r*, it is ∂p/∂r > 0 From (5.14), let us consider the implicit function K(c, p, r, w) ≡ F (p, w) – M(c, p, r, w) = 0 From (5.8) and (5.11), and remembering that in equilibrium p = pe, M(c, p, r, w) can be also written as M(c, p, r, w) = cF (p, w) + cG(r, p, w, i, E) with G(r, p, w, i, E) = rI/p. Since it is ∂G/∂p 0, then ∂p∂r = – (∂K/∂r)/(∂K/∂p) = – [s(∂F/∂r) – c(∂G/∂r)]/[s(∂F/∂p) – c(∂G/∂p)] with s = (1 – c). Since it is ∂F/∂r = 0, ∂G/∂r > 0, [s(∂F/∂r) – c(∂G/∂r) > 0, [s(∂F/∂p) – c(∂G/∂p)] > 0, then ∂p/∂r > 0 Proposition 2 At p = p* and r = r*, it is (B.1) ∂r/∂w > 0 ∂p/∂w > 0 The sign of ∂r/∂w can be easily determined from (5.15). Let us consider the implicit function 154 Effects of wage changes in Keynes’s model 155 R(r, w, i, E) ≡ G(r, w) – H(r, i, E) = 0 It is ∂r/∂w = – (∂R/∂w)/(∂R/∂r) = – [(∂G/∂w) – (∂H/∂w)]/[(∂G/∂r) – (∂H/∂r)] = (∂G/∂w)/[(∂G/∂r) – (∂H/∂r)] as ∂H/∂w = 0. Since it is ∂G/∂w 0 and ∂H/∂r 0 (B.2) The sign of ∂p/∂w is immediately obtained. Since ∂r/∂w > 0 and, from Proposition 1, ∂p/...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.