Corporate Power and Responsible Capitalism?
Show Less

Corporate Power and Responsible Capitalism?

Towards Social Accountability

Bryn Jones

In this important book, Bryn Jones uses insights from political economy, historical analysis and sociological concepts of the corporation, as a socially disembedded but political actor, to address concerns over the over-reach of Anglo-Saxon corporations. These firms are compared with their continental European and East Asian counterparts, both in their social and economic functions and their institutional structures. Jones then draws on alternative models proposed by advocates of CSR, cooperative enterprise and corporate democratisation, to argue for key reforms for corporations’ greater social accountability.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The ‘Anglo-Saxon’ business corporation: anatomy and evolution

Bryn Jones


Critics often liken corporations to grotesque life forms: ‘monsters’, ‘predators’, ‘behemoths’ – dinosaurs even. Such analogies suggest key evolutionary phases when their distinctive features mutated. So, what specific traits have corporations developed that assured their alien separation from most of the rest of society? More particularly how did these features help make corporations seemingly so ‘disembedded’ from, yet also dominant over, society? To survive and function all social institutions require an element of autonomy. Yet most, if not all, are intimately enmeshed in, and subject to other social relationships. The one institution widely regarded as towering over and separated from the rest of society is the autonomous state. Otherwise, as with the structure and functioning of the contemporary family for example, institutions are subjected to pressure and change from cultural, economic and political forces. Even if its critics are only partially correct, the typical contemporary business corporation has acquired both economic dominance and substantial independence from social forces. As Polanyi’s thesis, described in the Introduction, holds, released from its social bonds the disembedded enterprise has the potential to devour the institutions to which it was originally tied. Radical perspectives, such as Marxism, proffer automatic answers to this question: equating corporate supremacy with the necessary dominance and hegemony of capitalist interests. But this equation doesn’t, by itself, explain why one particular form of business organisation comes to dominate all others.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.