The Concept of Equilibrium in Different Economic Traditions
Show Less

The Concept of Equilibrium in Different Economic Traditions

An Historical Investigation

Bert Tieben

This book deals with one of the most puzzling concepts in economic science, that of economic equilibrium. In modern economics, equilibrium is considered a key assumption, but its role is contested by economists both from within the mainstream and from rival schools of thought.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Monetary Equilibrium

Bert Tieben


INTRODUCTION This chapter addresses the historical development of theories about monetary equilibrium. The definition of monetary equilibrium is one of the most controversial issues in economics. For most people, money and economics are synonymous, given that in real life virtually every economic transaction is conducted in terms of money. Whether it be in commodity, fiduciary, digital or plastic form, money represents purchasing power now and in the future and is thus an asset that people demand for transaction, precautionary or hoarding purposes. However, today economic science is still not able to fully integrate money and general equilibrium analysis, generally considered to be the theoretically most advanced part of our science. The reasons for this failure are not difficult to explain. The main problem is to explain why people demand money in equilibrium. Do we hold money as a precaution against unforeseen circumstances? In general equilibrium with a full set of forward markets nothing is unforeseen and money is a mere accounting unit. By the same token it would be foolish to hoard money for investment purposes, given that it bears no interest while other assets do. Hahn (1981) concluded that money transactions can only be explained as a transactions technology for which money is an input. But that runs into circular reasoning because we cannot explain why a particular asset performs this function: money is used to conduct transactions because it is money. It is possible to explain the transactions demand for money in terms of the mutual trust of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.