Edited by Sten Söderman and Harald Dolles
Chapter 2: A call for more mixed methods in sport management research
Many social and behavioral science researchers have promoted the use of mixed methods to more effectively answer research questions (Brewer and Hunter, 1989; Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Tashakkori and Teddlie, 1998, 2003). Such an approach has generally been defined as the combining of at least one quantitative method and one qualitative method (e.g., Hanson et al., 2005; Jick. 1979; Maxwell and Loomis, 2003). Combining quantitative and qualitative data in a single study can be beneficial in a variety of ways. For example, the researcher can triangulate which involves combining quantitative and qualitative methods to produce a set of data that has complementary strengths and nonoverlapping weaknesses (Brewer and Hunter, 1989; Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Johnson and Turner, 2003; Tashakkori and Teddlie, 1998). This concept of combining approaches for complementary strengths and non overlapping weaknesses has been called the fundamental principle of mixed research (Johnson and Turner, 2003). The idea is to strategically select a mixture of quantitative and qualitative approaches that will effectively cover the objective or set of objectives of a research study and to do it in a way that eliminates overall study design weaknesses.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.