Chinese Intellectual Property and Technology Laws
Show Less

Chinese Intellectual Property and Technology Laws

Edited by Rohan Kariyawasam

Written by some of China’s leading academic experts and with a foreword by the former Chief Justice of the IP Tribunal of China’s Supreme People’s Court, this book combines for the very first time a review of both Chinese intellectual property and technology laws in a single volume in English.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Protection of Intellectual Property in Hong Kong

Michael Pendleton


Michael Pendleton1 7.1. INTRODUCTION Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People’s Republic of China. Much of China’s entire legal system was created in the early 1980s, the Trademark Law 1982 for example. However, Hong Kong has as long a history and immersion in intellectual property as many countries of Western Europe or the United States. This, of course, is due to the influence of the United Kingdom during the period in which it colonized Hong Kong. As a result, Hong Kong’s intellectual property laws are rich and diverse. For at least a century, these laws have also been heavily biased in favour of the rights holder, the colonial power having taken the view that this is essential to enticing foreign capital. Indeed Hong Kong, which is a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), was the first member of the WTO to seek TRIPS compliance for its intellectual property laws. Hong Kong is a member of the WTO independently of China and in its own right. In fact, it is the only non-sovereign member state of the WTO. In addition to the complexity of Hong Kong’s intellectual property law, the judge-made law, that is the common law, is equally rich and diverse. For a long time, and even to an extent today, members of the Hong Kong judiciary were appointed from the ranks of experienced barristers (advocates) from foreign jurisdictions such as England, Australia, New Zealand and other Commonwealth countries. Today, large numbers of its judges...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.