Theory, Networks, History
Chapter 13: Conclusion
INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM OF EXPLAINING SUCCESS The theory of entrepreneurship set out in this book was originally developed to ‘plug a gap’ in economic theory. There are various symptoms of this gap, including the lack of a convincing account of market processes, and the omission of strategic leadership from the theory of the firm. In conventional economics the existence of firms and markets is regarded as given rather than as something that needs to be explained. Conventional economics, it is often pointed out, is inherently static; even growth is often analysed as a steady-state process. By recognizing the importance of a specific class of people dedicated to the pursuit of change, the study of entrepreneurship transforms static analysis into dynamic analysis. According to this dynamic analysis, the pace of change adjusts to the threats and opportunities faced by the economy. Increasing demand for change translates into increasing demand for entrepreneurs, which increases prospective profits, and triggers a corresponding increase in their supply. Perhaps the most fundamental problem with conventional economics is that it does not have a satisfactory theory of success. It does not explain fully why certain people are able to derive so much profit from the market process, nor why some small firms grow into successful large firms whilst many others fail. A successful economy depends on the cumulative effects of numerous initiatives undertaken by successful people. The limited supply of potentially successful people is a major constraint on national economic performance. Increasing this supply is an important...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.