Biotechnology and Software Patent Law
Show Less

Biotechnology and Software Patent Law

A Comparative Review of New Developments

Edited by Emanuela Arezzo and Gustavo Ghidini

The new millennium has carried several challenges for patent law. This up-to-date book provides readers with an important overview of the most critical issues patent law is still facing today at the beginning of the twenty first century, on both sides of the Atlantic.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Patent Governance in the United States: Lessons from Bilski v. Kappos

John R. Thomas


John R. Thomas INTRODUCTION On the final day of its October 2009 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its eagerly awaited decision in Bilski v. Kappos.1 The patent bar’s patience would not be rewarded. Those who urged the Court to overturn the lower court decision were disappointed, as all nine Justices agreed that Bilski’s claimed commodities trading risk-hedging method did not comprise patentable subject matter. Yet the Court also frustrated observers who, based upon the tone of its earlier opinions and its questions during oral argument, had come to believe that business methods would be declared unpatentable. Rather, the Court opted ‘to leave open the possibility of some business method patents’ even as it dismissed the ‘broad patentability of such claimed inventions’.2 Bilski quickly took its place within a line of recent Supreme Court opinions that readily set aside the rulings of lower courts but provide scant concrete guidance in their place. Bilski casts significant doubt upon the increasingly popular view that judicial decisions provide the best mechanism for achieving patent reform in the United States. For of late developments in U.S. patent law have often followed an unusual two-step procedure. First comes the airing of considerable industry concerns during a hearing before the Congress. The next step comes from an entirely different branch of government: a judicial opinion that endeavors to address those concerns. To many observers, including leading academics at the nation’s top law schools, this idiosyncratic method provides the optimal pathway for patent law reform.3 But this...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.