Rural Transformations and Development – China in Context
Show Less

Rural Transformations and Development – China in Context

The Everyday Lives of Policies and People

Edited by Norman Long, Jingzhong Ye and Yihuan Wang

This unique book explores the varied perspectives on contemporary processes of rural transformation and policy intervention in China. The expert contributors combine a critical review of current theoretical viewpoints and global debates with a series of case studies that document the specificities of China’s pathways to change. Central issues focus on the dynamics of state–peasant encounters; the diversification of labour and livelihoods; out-migration and the blurring of rural and urban scenarios; the significance of issues of ‘value’ and ‘capital’ and their gender implications; land ownership and sustainable resource management; struggles between administrative cadres and local actors; and the dilemmas of ‘participatory’ development.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 12: Stalemate of Participation: Participatory Village Development Planning for Poverty Alleviation in China

Li Xiaoyun and Liu Xiaoqian

Extract

12. Stalemate of participation: participatory village development planning for poverty alleviation in China1 Li Xiaoyun and Liu Xiaoqian INTRODUCTION The populist notion and practice of participatory development was instigated in China by international organizations in the 1990s and aimed at facilitating change in China’s system of top-down planning. This has resulted in a complex situation. The spread of such a project-based participatory approach – applied to both overseas donor and government-funded interventions – led, in the 2000s, to its scaling up to influence national policy-making. Its achievements, however, present uneven evidence. On the one hand, it has levered open arenas once closed off to the voice of citizens or to public scrutiny, and draws upon alternative visions of democracy. Such moves have helped to widen the political space so that citizens can play more of a part in the making and the shaping of decisions that affect their lives (Brock et al. 2001; Webster and Engberg-Pederson 2002). The rich experience gained has become a ‘model’ for ‘mainstreaming’ at the macro level (Li Xiaoyun 1999), and as a means of further broadening the scope of policy-making through so-called ‘bilateral policy dialogue’. This has been ongoing with bilateral agreements, and some positive effects of the participation can be articulated. For example, official and political discourse has changed to being ‘people-centered’; public hearings concerning public goods delivery in urban management have become widely practiced; and likewise with ‘information transparency boards’ concerned with rural governance; and there is more evidence and recognition of ‘ordered democracy’ found...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.